Economics and Alaska
To leave a comment click on the word "comment" at the end of each post.
Click here for Atom feed
Race for World Bank President
The Fight for Free Trade
Australian economics blogging
Canadian economics blogging
UK economics blogging
Viennese economics blogging
Sports economics blogs
Policy Essays and Papers
Where are visitors to this page?
(Auto-update daily since 12-27-04)
Steve Verdon explains moral hazard
Steve Verdon explains moral hazard at his blog Deinonychus antirrhopus. Here: "Moral Hazard, Adverse Selection and Insurance"
Why do corporate managers have an incentive to overinvest in good government gurus?
These agents are more risk-averse than their principals, the stockholders. Professor Bainbridge explains here: "The corporate governance racket".
The iterative prisoners' dilemma
Lawrence Solum covers the iterative prisoner's dilemma at his Legal Theory Blog. On Sunday he posted an introduction to the iterated prisoners' dilemma for law students, here: "Legal Theory Lexicon: The Prisoner's Dilemma"
Two posts by Lynne Kiesling at her blog The Knowledge Problem link to public choice materials.
First, her post "TWO MORE INTERESTING ECONOMICS BITS" links to an article by James Buchanan ("Public Choice: Politics Without Romance" from Policy magazine, a journal of the Centre for Independent Studies) on the origins and significance of public choice theory. Buchanan was "present at the creation." He talks about the ideas that piqued his interest, the origins and significance of his book (co-authored with Gordon Tullock) The Calculus of Consent, the charge that public choice theory is ideologically motivated, the charge that public choice theory is immoral, and the contemporary significance of public choice theory. A lot of good stuff in six - non-technical - pages. Is public choice theory ideologically biased? An answer depends on an appreciation of
"Public choice then came along and provided analyses of the behavior of persons acting politically, whether voters, politicians or bureaucrats. These analyses exposed the essentially false comparisons that were then informing so much of both scientific and public opinion. In a very real sense, public choice became a set of theories of governmental failures, as an offset to the theories of market failures that had previously emerged from theoretical welfare economics. Or, as I put it in the title of a lecture in Vienna in 1978, public choice may be summarised by the three-word description, 'politics without romance'.
"The public choice research programme is better seen as a correction of the scientific record than as the introduction of an anti-governmental ideology. Regardless of any ideological bias, exposure to public choice analysis necessarily brings a more critical attitude toward politicised nostrums to alleged socioeconomic problems. Public choice almost literally forces the critic to be pragmatic in comparing alternative constitutional arrangements, disallowing any presumption that bureaucratic corrections for market failures will accomplish the desired objectives..."
Will we grow our way out of the Social Security/Medicare problem?
Arnold Kling thinks we might, and explains why in The American Enterprise Online: "Will Science Save Social Security?".
The pros and cons of taxing sin
Jim Leitzel, at the blog Vice Squad, looks at the pros and cons of legalizing and taxing vices such as drugs and prostitution. There are two related postings. This one, on discussions over potential legalization of prostitution, "Legal Prostitution for Las Vegas? Thailand?" is the basis for the second, which gives an economic analysis of the pros and cons of legalizing and taxing this and other vices: "Tax Revenues as a Benefit of Vice Legalization".
A good prediction
In early September Max Zawicky (at the blog MaxSpeak, You Listen!) predicted:
"As we speak, Republicans in Congress are writing up more tax cuts, this time for corporations. They will sail under the flag of "fixing" the foreign sales corporations (FSC) loophole that has been found to be illegal by the World Trade Organization...
"...A small problem is that the FSC can't be fixed in a way that will be WTO-legal because the fault is in the basic structure of the corporate income tax. This dispute has been festering for decades. But not to worry, attached to the FSC fix will be all sorts of peripheral tax breaks that will survive, even as the FSC component remains in ever-lasting international legal limbo."
Friday's New York Times reports:
"...In an attempt to placate as many groups as possible, the House proposal would repeal the original export tax break for what is known as extraterritorial income and replace it with a broader array of corporate tax breaks worth more than twice as much.
"Repealing the old tax break would bring the Treasury about $50 billion over 10 years, and the bill would raise nearly $30 billion more by blocking a variety of tax shelters and loopholes. But the new tax breaks would be worth about $142 billion over 10 years, leaving the net cost to the government at about $60 billion over the next decade."
P.S. 10-26-03 Steven Pearlstein had a column in the Washington Post on this corporate tax cut bill on Oct 22: " 'Reforming' The Corporate Income Tax".
Edward Lotterman discusses the influence of the late ecologist Garrett Hardin, here, in the Twin Cities Pioneer Press: "Real World Economics: Common property systems have uncommon results".
Do girls cause divorce?
David Leonhardt describes recent economics research suggesting that:
"Over the last 60 years, parents with an only child that was a girl were 6 percent more likely to split up than parents of a single boy. The gap rose to 8 percent for parents of two girls versus those of two boys, 10 percent for families with three children of the same sex and 13 percent for four. Every year, more than 10,000 American divorces appear to stem partly from the number of girls in the family..."
These research results have been covered elsewhere. I can think of two columns by Steven Landsburg in Slate, "Oh, No: It's a Girl! Do daughters cause divorce?" on October 2, and "Maybe Parents Don't Like Boys Better. A follow-up to the recent column about whether daughters cause divorce." on October 14.
The "Baltic dry" index is up. What does that mean for you?
Daniel Gross explains what the "Baltic dry" leading economic indicator is, where its been going recently, and what it might mean, in this Slate column: "The Shipping News. The best economic indicator you've never heard of.".
The continuing power of sunk costs
Sunk costs, costs that have been irretrievably incurred, and which can't be changed by a decision, shouldn't play a role in the decision. Cognitive psychologists, however, tell us that they still sway us. A case in point:
"...Ted Stevens, who chairs the powerful U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee, said giving the pollock to Adak is important for the state, for the Aleut people and for making some use of a military installation that cost taxpayers more than $3 billion."
Why public administrators should know something about opportunity costs
The Economist had a review of a new book on public security in the Oct 16 issue - Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly About Security in an Uncertain World by Bruce Schneier. Schneier is an expert in computer security writing for a general audience, and evaluating the suite of security measures to which we are increasingly subject. The Economist gave it a good review (I can't link to it because it's "premium content").
One of Schneier's points, summarized in the review, is that id checks at building entrances, may not be very helpful - in fact, may be a counter-productive - because of the opportunity costs (and psychological effects) they entail:
Stiglitz's new book
During the 1990s, Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz was Chairman of Clinton's Council of Economic Advisors and Chief Economist of the World Bank. He's just published his account of U.S. economic policy during the 1990s: The Roaring Nineties (Norton, 2003). The book provides a left-liberal critique of Clinton administration and Federal Reserve policy during the period from an insider. Some related material on the web:
Stiglitz rehearsed his arguments in an Atlantic magazine article in October, 2002: "The Roaring Nineties"
In 1998, even before leaving the World Bank, Stiglitz discussed the lessons he'd learned during his time in the Clinton Administration, in an article in the Journal of Economic Perspectives, "Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government. The Private Uses of Public Interests: Incentives and Institutions." (JEP, 12(5):3-22 - accessible via JSTOR). Stiglitz asks why its so hard for government to implement Pareto Optimal policy changes - after all, no one loses - and draws on his experiences to suggest four hypotheses.
Jason Nisse, a Business Editor for 'The Independent on Sunday' reviews Stiglitz's book and Paul Krugman's new book, here: The Roaring Nineties: Seeds of Destruction By Joseph Stiglitz. The Great Unravelling: From Boom to Bust in Three Scandalous Years By Paul Krugman. With respect to Stiglitz
"If you swallow that line, and switch off most of your critical faculties, this is an enjoyable book. It sticks it to American capitalism just the way that any pro-European liberal (and I include myself in this category) might want it to. Stiglitz's fact-light, high-octane writing style fair zips along. There are hardly any pesky footnotes and an almost total absence of figures. What's more, this all comes from an American economist who won the Nobel Prize, so take that, you Republicans.
"But therein lies the danger. This book can lead you into all sorts of trouble if you try to rely upon it. Stiglitz's selective use of facts leaves his arguments all full of holes. I'm sure he has the research backing for every word he writes, but it does not come through in the text. Anyone fresh from The Roaring Nineties and hoping to deploy Stiglitz's arguments to shut up that pesky neighbour who works in the City, will suddenly find themselves in an intellectual version of the final scene from Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. Heck. I can shoot Stiglitz's arguments out of the skies. And I largely agree with him."
The Economist finds the interest of the book in Stiglitz's description of policy making in the Clinton administration: "Mr Stiglitz goes to Washington"
Tyler Cowen reviews the book at his blog, Marginal Revolution, here: "The new Stiglitz book".
Brad DeLong critiques Stiglitz's analysis of the Clinton administration's 1993 deficit reduction plan, here: "Department of "Huh?"". DeLong had a position in the Treasury, and was in a position to know what was happening. The Treasury Department is criticized by Stiglitz in the book.
The book has the subtitle "Seeds of Destruction" in the British edition - not in the U.S. edition.
How much are intellectual property rights worth?
Eugene Volokh points out that the song, "Happy Birthday" is still under copyright, and tells what the copyright cost 15 years ago, and how much it brings in in royalties each year, here: "Happy Birthday!".
Bill Owens, Governor of Colorado
Virginia Postrel links to two items that touch on fiscal management in Colorado, and that highlight Colorado's "Tabor" (Tax Payers Bill of Rights). One is a George Will column puffing Bill Owens, the conservative governor of Colorado, the other is a selection from a Wall Street Journal column by Owens advising California Gov-elect Schwarzenegger to push for a California Tabor. Postrel's posting with its links is here: "GOOD GOVERNMENT IN COLORADO"
Colorado's Tabor appears to be a provision that "...restricts the growth of per capita tax revenue to population growth plus inflation..." (George Will) without a popular vote.
Are the rich getting richer and the poor poorer?
Various measures of income distribution indicate that the proportions of income accuring to the top decile of the population is getting larger. But Kevin Brancato at Truck and Barter notes that "percentiles are not people." In other words, we need to take a look at what happens to individuals through time as well as what happens to percentiles, or deciles, or quintiles. Income mobility is an important dimension of the income distribution issue, and there is a lot of mobility in the U.S. through time. He posts here: "Percentiles are not People ". Brancato's post gives insights into the measurement and definition problems in this topic area, and has lots of links to other materials.
Michael at 2blowhards provides links to a suite of behavioral economics links, here: "Behavioral Economics 101". I learned about this at the Marginal Revolution.
What is the Coase theorem?
Lawrence Solum explains it for law students at his Legal Theory Blog, here: "Legal Theory Lexicon: The Coase Theorem". I learned about this from the blog Crescat Sententia
Tobacco ban in prison spurs creation of black market
A ban on smoking on Colorado prisons has spurred creation of a black market in tobacco. According to this article by Kirk Mitchell in the Denver Post,
"An $11 can of Bugler tobacco can generate $5,000 in sales of toilet-paper-rolled cigarettes in the Colorado State Penitentiary. Cocaine, by comparison, only sees an 800 percent markup behind bars...
"Other wives passed balloons filled with tobacco to their husbands' mouths when they kissed in prison waiting rooms, he said.
" "A wife of another inmate made papier-mache lava rocks filled with tobacco and dropped them in a rock garden where inmate groundskeepers friendly to her husband would work, Claspell said..."
" "Some prisoners refer to (the tobacco contraband law) as a retirement assistance program for correctional officers," inmate G. A. Bowers said in a newsletter called "Inside Justice" published at the Fremont Correctional Facility."...
Colo. Move spawns black market, arrests". I learned about this from the blog Vice Squad.
Does the smoking externality justify government intervention?
Professor Bainbridge analyses the externality argument for government imposed "no-smoking" regulations (not every externality requires government action for for efficient resolution) in his blog:
The mere existence of an externality does not justify legislation, however. In a free society, with limited government and respect for private property rights, at least two conditions must be satisfied before government intervention is warranted. First, my actions must in fact produce external costs. Second, there must be a market failure -- that is, people must be unable to solve the problem without government help.
Because I’ve conceded the first prong of the test, the merits of public smoking bans comes down to the question of whether the problem can be solved private ordering. In other words, if we let the owners of private property decide whether people will be allowed to smoke on their premises, will non-smokers be exposed to unreasonable costs?..."
Should China float its exchange rate?
Joseph Stiglitz (Clinton Council of Economic Advisors chair, chief economist at the World Bank, Nobel Prize winner) says no in this Guardian column: "First Japan, Now China is the Culprit. In Reality, the US Has Only Itself to Blame for its Swelling Trade Deficit"
"...China is right to have ignored America's demands. Floating the exchange rate would expose the country to instabilities that would lead to a host of further problems. A higher exchange rate would undermine job creation and would contribute to deflation, which China is successfully combating..."
Response to Jane Galt
I linked to Meghan McArdle's Tech Central Station column on the problems unfunded Social Security and Medicare liabilities will pose, here: "Social Security's unfunded liabilities". Max Zawicky critiques her piece, here: "From The Desk and I Do Have One ...".
The fruits of 20 years of drug control
Jane Galt points to a Mark Kleiman blog posting ("The limits of drug law enforcement") on an extremely large drop in the wholesale and retail prices of heroin "in the face of an enforcement effort that increased the number of drug dealers behind bars from about 30,000 in 1980 to about 450,000 today."
Do religious monopolies backfire?
Randall Parker at ParaPundit draws attention to a New York Times story on the loss of religious faith in Europe. He points to a theory mentioned in the article that the state-sponsored religious monopolies to which Europe has been prone have (a) led people to be suspicious of the major denominations so sponsored, and (b) led to a lessening of interest in religion ("In a free market, people get more interested in the product..."). I'm skeptical about the second point; the intense interest in religion in Islamic countries or in Europe in the Middle Ages suggests otherwise.
Social Security's unfunded liabilities
Megan McArdle (aka "Jane Galt" - see her blog, here: "Asymmetrical Information") has a column on the unfunded liabilities of the Social Security and Medicare programs today at the Tech Central Station: "The Bad News Is the Good News Is Irrelevant". Be afraid, be very afraid - whether you are older and have factored Social Security into your retirement planning, or whether you are young and will have to support all those old people.
When nature ran amok in Alaska
Doug O'Harra reports on the Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science September conference, "Extreme Events: Understanding Perturbations to the Physical and Biological Environment," in this Anchorage Daily News story: "Catastrophes shaped Alaska. GROUND ZERO: Conferees discuss effects of jolts by natural forces". Among the papers, one described the following disaster:
"Then, about 300 B.C., a large earthquake dropped the land nine to 15 feet, altering their lives on a scale almost unthinkable in modern experience.
" "This led to the complete inundation and complete destruction of almost every sockeye salmon lake on the western Alaska Peninsula," said Herb Maschner, the lead archaeologist in a 10-year study of ancient Aleut culture and its environment. "As you can imagine, this would be a bad day if you were a sockeye salmon fisherman..."
"...Food sources were almost certainly obliterated, kayaks lost, belongings awash in the next high tide. But the survivors were resilient.
The archaeological record tells us that they regrouped into a few big villages, creating towns with an estimated 1,000 residents, larger than any other Far North settlements of the age. Driven by basic survival, they switched from salmon to marine mammals. And the culture began to glorify hunters and their tools...
Should we reduce barriers to the free flow of capital across national boundaries?
Even in the developing countries? Daniel Drezner argues yes, in this Tech Central Station column: "Against Sedentary Lifestyles".
Followup on bear attack at Katmai
Sometime earlier this week a grizzly bear in Alaska's Katmai National Part attacked, killed, and ate (or cached for future eating) a nationally known bear "expert" and his girlfriend. I posted links to two stories by Anchorage Daily News reporter Craig Medred, here: "Alaska grizzly bear attack". Those stories described the almost unbelievably foolhardy behavior of the party. An Alaska Department of Fish and Game bear biologist has investigated the scene and filed his report on what happened. The Anchorage Daily News carries Medred's story on that report today, here: "Biologist believes errors led to attack". The biologist's report describes almost unbelievable behavior - pitching camp right next to a bear trail, approaching to within 10 feet of a sow with cubs.
Financial compensation for cadaveric organ donation
Alex Tabarrok argues for it in this Marginal Revolution blog posting: "Dollars for Donors".
"...Aside from the obvious benefits of saving lives, financial compensation for organ donation [Tabarrok appears to be talking specifically about cadaveric donation - Ben] would likely save money. Here is a back-of-the-envelope calculation. There are some 285,000 people on dialysis in the US. Transplants are cheaper than dialysis by something like $10-$25,000 per year. About a quarter of those on dialysis are on the waiting list but perhaps as many as half could benefit from a transplant (fewer people are put on the list because of the shortage.) Let's take the lower numbers. Assume that a quarter of the patients on dialysis could benefit from a transplant and that cost savings are $10,000 a year for five years. Then ending the shortage would save 3.5 billion dollars. Note again that this is a lower estimate. How much would it cost to end the shortage? No one knows for certain but I think a $5000 gift to the estates of organ donors would increase supply enough to greatly alleviate the shortage - that would involve doubling the supply to 12,000 for a paltry cost of $60 million. If this is not enough - raise the gift - anyway you cut it, the savings from dialysis exceed the costs of compensating donors by a large margin.
"We should in fact count the value of the lives saved. If we can save 6000 lives and value each life at 3 million dollars (a lower value than what the US government typically uses in its calculations) then that is a further gain of 18 billion dollars."
Transparency International has released the latest version of its corruption perceptions index (CPI). The countries of the world are graded from one to ten (10 is a "clean" rating). Finland and Iceland are perceived to be the least corrupt (9.7 and 9.6) while Nigeria and Bangladesh are perceived to be the most corrupt (1.4 and 1.3). The U.S. and Ireland are ranked 18th. The index is provided here: "Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2003". I learned about this from Tyler Cowen at Marginal Revolution
Alaska grizzly bear attack
Outdoor writer and bear expert Timothy Treadwell and his girlfriend were killed and eaten by a grizzly bear in Alaska's Katmai National Park. Apparently the attack was accidentally tape recorded. Craig Medred, the Anchorage Daily News outdoor writer covered the story in yesterday's issue ("Wildlife author killed, eaten by bears he loved");
"Alaska State Troopers and National Park Service officials said Timothy Treadwell, 46, and girlfriend Amie Huguenard, 37, were killed and partially eaten by a bear or bears near Kaflia Bay, about 300 miles southwest of Anchorage, earlier this week.
"Scientists who study Alaska brown bears said they had been warning Treadwell for years that he needed to be more careful around the huge and powerful coastal twin of the grizzly.
"Treadwell's films of close-up encounters with giant bears brought him a bounty of national media attention. The fearless former drug addict from Malibu, Calif. -- who routinely eased up close to bears to chant "I love you'' in a high-pitched, sing-song voice -- was the subject of a show on the Discovery Channel and a report on "Dateline NBC." Blond, good-looking and charismatic, he appeared for interviews on David Letterman's show and "The Rosie O'Donnell Show" to talk about his bears. He even gave them names: Booble, Aunt Melissa, Mr. Chocolate, Freckles and Molly, among others.
"A self-proclaimed eco-warrior, he attracted something of a cult following too. Chuck Bartlebaugh of "Be Bear Aware,'' a national bear awareness campaign, called Treadwell one of the leaders of a group of people engaged in "a trend to promote getting close to bears to show they were not dangerous.
" "He kept insisting that he wanted to show that bears in thick brush aren't dangerous. The last two people killed (by bears) in Glacier National Park went off the trail into the brush. They said their goal was to find a grizzly bear so they could 'do a Timothy.' We have a trail of dead people and dead bears because of this trend that says, 'Let's show it's not dangerous.' ''
"But even Treadwell knew that getting close with brown bears in thick cover was indeed dangerous..."
" "Get out here. I'm getting killed.''
"Words caught on a tape recording of the attack also reveal Treadwell's girlfriend, Amie Huguenard, shouting at him to play dead, then encouraging him to fight back.
"Alaska State Troopers report that is what they heard on a videotape recovered Monday at the scene of a bear mauling in Katmai National Park and Preserve. The tape was in a camera found near the bear-buried remains of Treadwell, 46, and Huguenard, 37.
"Troopers spokesman Greg Wilkinson said there are no pictures on the tape, leading troopers to believe the attack might have happened while the camera was stuffed in a duffle bag or during the dark of night. Treadwell had talked to an associate in Malibu, Calif., by satellite phone around noon Sunday. He mentioned no problems with any bears.
"The remains of the Southern Californians who periodically came to Alaska to live intimately with the bears were found the next day. A large but scrawny old bear with bad teeth that a pilot had seen sitting on the brush and dirt pulled over the bodies was shot and killed by National Park Service rangers at the scene after it charged them..."
The Economic Plan for Iraq
Jeff Madrick reports on the economic blueprint for Iraq, here in the New York Times: "An Extreme Plan for Iraq" (This link will go dead before too long).
"But by almost any mainstream economist's standard, the plan, already approved by L. Paul Bremer III, the American in charge of the Coalition Provisional Authority, is extreme — in fact, stunning. It would immediately make Iraq's economy one of the most open to trade and capital flows in the world, and put it among the lowest taxed in the world, rich or poor. Is this Middle Eastern nation, racked by war, ready for such severe experimentation? Moreover, the radical laws have been adopted without a democratic Iraqi government to discuss or approve them..."
Job loss point and counterpoint
Louis Uchitelle reports (in the New York Times) on efforts to count the jobs lost in the U.S. as manufacturing activity is "outsourced" overseas - but Brad Delong points out fundamental flaws in the exercise. Uchitelle: "A Missing Statistic: U.S. Jobs That Went Overseas" This link will go dead before too long, but DeLong quotes essential bits from it here, in his response: "Not the Right Number to Report".
Daniel Gross at Slate explains how the federal government counts jobs. Which is better, the "establishment survey" or the "household survey?" The answer has political implications. "Antidisestablishmentarianism. The partisan duel over the latest Bush trick to embellish economic data.". Brad DeLong on the same topic, here: "Allan Meltzer Long Ago Stopped Being Careful".
The Alaska Permanent Fund distribution
One of the more unusual events in U.S. public finance begins next week, when the Alaska permanent Fund begins its annual distribution. For years Alaska has been stashing away a large part of its oil income in the Permanent Fund. The fund currently has a about $25.5 billion in assets. Each year the fund distributions a share of its earnings to every Alaskan.
The Anchorage Daily News carries a story on this year's distribution by Mary Pemberton, here: "Alaskans prepare to spend annual windfall".
"In the days leading up to the disbursement, Alaskans are inundated with offers from businesses competing for the dividend money.
"Pawn shops offer to cash checks in the hope that recipients will drop their entire dividend in their stores. Huge blinking signs advertise PFD specials at car dealerships in Anchorage. Travel companies offer special tours to Mexico and Europe. A clothing store is running a newspaper ad of a buxom blond in black fishnet lingerie encouraging readers to have "some P.F.D. fun."
"The amount of the dividend is calculated on a five-year average of Permanent Fund investment income derived from stocks, bonds and real estate investments. The sharp decrease in the last few years was caused by the hit technology stocks took in the stock market in the late 1990s..."
Many Alaskan's think Iraq needs a permanent fund of its own. Former Permanent Fund Executive Director Dave Rose, maintains a web page devoted to this idea, here: The Iraqi Permanent Fund. Several Alaskan papers carried an Associated Press story on this last summer. Here's the Juneau Empire: "Alaskans propose permanent fund to help Iraqis".
More Modigliani obituaries
The Nobel winning economist Franco Modigliani died on September 25. I posted links to several obituaries, here: "Nobel prize winning economist Franco Modigliani dies". Here are a couple more. Richard Adams at The Guardian: "Franco Modigliani". Francesco Giavazzi at The Independent, here: "Professor Franco Modigliani". Pierleone Ottolenghi
at Open Democracy, here: "In memory of Franco Modigliani". (I learned about this from Marginal Revolution. The Economist carries an obituary here, "An adventurous economist", but its part of the premium content.
The market for human body parts
Tyler Cowen posts on the market in human organs, providing information on what is going on, and discussing the pros and cons of such a market, here: "Organ trafficking".
First agriculture, then manufacturing
What's really going on with all those manufacturing jobs? Alex Tabarrok at Marginal Revolution points to the revolution in productivity: "Manufacturing fallacies".
This looks good:
Stephen Bainbridge, at ProfessorBainbridge.com points to Order Without Law. How Neighbors Settle Disputes by Robert Ellickson in this post: "Briefly noted"About the book he says,"Robert Ellickson famously studied the way in which residents of Shasta County, California resolved disputes over trespassing cattle. Robert C. Ellickson, Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes (1991). Ellickson found that that “large segments of social life are located and shaped beyond the reach of law.” (4) Most disputes are resolved without resort to law."
The Amazon web page, with table of contents and long extracts is here: Order Without Law. How Neighbors Settle Disputes. This is a Harvard University Press book, the Harvard page on the book says this about it:
The springboard for Ellickson's theory of norms is his close investigation of a variety of disputes arising from the damage created by escaped cattle in Shasta County, California. In "The Problem of Social Cost" --the most frequently cited article on law--economist Ronald H. Cease depicts farmers and ranchers as bargaining in the shadow of the law while resolving cattle-trespass disputes. Ellickson's field study of this problem refutes many of the behavioral assumptions that underlie Coase's vision, and will add realism to future efforts to apply economic analysis to law.
Drawing examples from a wide variety of social contexts, including whaling grounds, photocopying centers, and landlord-tenant relations, Ellickson explores the interaction between informal and legal rules and the usual domains in which these competing systems are employed. Order without Law firmly grounds its analysis in real-world events, while building a broad theory of how people cooperate to mutual advantage."
Part I. Shasta County
1. Shasta County and Its Cattle Industry
2. The Politics of Cattle Trespass
3. The Resolution of Cattle-Trespass Disputes
4. Who Pays for Boundary Fences?
5. Disputes Arising out of Highway Collisions Involving Livestock
6. The Effects of Closed-Range Ordinances
Part II. A Theory of Norms
7. The System of Social Control
8. Shortcomings of Current Theories of Social Control
9. The Puzzle of Cooperation
10. A Hypothesis of Welfare-Maximizing Norms
11. Substantive Norms: Of Bees, Cattle, and Whales
12. Remedial Norms: Of Carrots and Sticks
13. Procedural and Constitutive Norms: Of Gossip, Ritual, and Hero Worship
14. Controller-Selecting Norms: Of Contracts, Custom, and Photocopies
Part III. The Future of Norms
15. Testing the Content of Norms
16. Conclusions and Implications
Dan Ryan has some reading notes on Ellickson's book for his Mills College sociology course, here: "Ellickson Order Without Law a few reading notes...", here: "Chapter 6". and here: "Chapter 7". Herbert Jacob reviews the book at this Barnes and Nobel web site: Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes.
Ellickson did his research in an unlikely site: Shasta County, California where he found cattlemen living under both open and closed range legal rules. This provided Ellickson a place to examine disputes involving ranchers about liability and fence-tending, for errant cattle have long created problems in locales where ranching is a major activity. Disputes of this sort are also the basis of much theorizing by Ronald Coase and his followers. Ellickson began his research seeking to find how the law affected ranchers' perception of liability for cattle trespass. Much to his surprise, the law plays almost no role in disputes about cattle that wander into neighboring ranches or residential plots nor is it prominent in the ways in which neighbors divide the costs of fence building and maintenance.
These matters, Ellickson discovered, are governed by work-a-day norms of neighborliness. The residents of Shasta County keep an informal ledger of debits and credits. When cattle cause damage, their owners are expected to provide an appropriate remedy -- moving them quickly and making good the damages. Small wrongs are simply entered into the ranchers' mental ledger for repayment in kind at some later time. When fences need to be built or maintained, ranchers reach informal, oral agreements which involve payment in kind rather a contract that compensates in cash for materials or labor provided by a neighbor. Only when cars and trucks hit cattle are more formal processes invoked. Ellickson attributes the use of law in these cases to the involvement of insurance companies, of strangers, and occasionally of large stakes. However, accident cases producing only minor damage are mostly settled informally without litigation.
Why is law so little used where so much law is on the books? Ellickson finds the answer in the host of informal norms governing the lives of ranchers and their neighbors in Shasta County. They employ informal norms, rather than the law, because they constitute a close knit group with many ties to one another. Their mutual obligations and the availability of informal sanctions to enforce them keep almost all follows: residents within the bounds of civility. Being a good neighbor is paramount because these men depend upon one another in myriad ways. Ellickson turns to both a law and economics approach and particularly to game theory to elaborate his theory. People, he argues, seek to minimize "deadweight costs" and transaction costs. Ellickson defines deadweight costs as those greater than the optimal, cooperative solution in a two-person game. He then argues that in almost every instance the employment of informal norms reaches such an outcome..."
Free trade misconceptions
Daniel Drezer points to an article on the benefits and costs of free trade in the November/December issue of Foreign Policy. Drezner's post is here: "Your weekend reading". The article, by Arvind Panagariya, professor of economics and codirector of the Center for International Economics at the University of Maryland, College Park, is available at the magazine's website, here: "Think Again: International Trade ". Foreign Policy as an article devoted to exposing misconceptions and "myths" about a particular topic in each issue (using a question and answer format). this is one of those.
How long does it take a city to recover from a devastating earthquake?
Virginia Postrel posts today on assessments of the Japanese recovery from the Kobe earthquake of 1995 (here: "Earthquake Preparedness Cont'd").
This was a big disaster. Gary Becker (one of her linkees) described it in an October 2001 Business Week column as:
Postrel also links to a 1998 article she commissioned (as editor) for Reason magazine. This article, by Michael J. Oakes, takes a much less optimistic view of the speed of the recovery (as indicated by his title: "Shaky Recovery. Three years after a devastating earthquake, Kobe is still in ruins. Why can't Japan cope with disasters?").
Oakes' theme is the limitations of public administration and plannng in the face of disaster, and the lessons he can draw from this for administratively guided economies such as Japan's.
"This is, then, a frustrating story. It is one that raises serious questions about Japan's much-vaunted devotion to top-down order and stability and its implementation of a "plan-rational" at almost every level of society. Over the past two decades and as the first of the great Asian tigers, Japan has been hailed for the success of its "administrative guidance," its ability to implement elite economic planning that somehow managed to steer clear both of the "excesses" of unbridled capitalism and the poverty of a command economy. As its economy went into recession in the '90s, enthusiasm for Japanese-style economic management and planning understandably waned. A close look at the Kobe earthquake and the city's slow recovery efforts suggests reasons for the larger problems in Japan's economy..."
The Nobel prize
This year's Nobel prize for literature was awarded to John M. Coetzee of the University of Chicago. The other Nobel prize award announcements are coming up, including the announcement of the Nobel prize in economics. Actually, the economists get the "The Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel" which is something different. See "Nobel by association: beautiful mind, non-existent prize" by Yves Gringas. I linked to this about this time last year, here: "When is a Nobel Prize not a Nobel Prize?".
"Marginal Revolution" posts
I'm finding myself linking to posts over at the new blog Marginal Revolution a lot these days. But here are two new ones:
Tyler Cowen links to a Stephen Landsburg column at Slate highlighting research that suggests that couples who have girls are more likely to divorce. Apparently the the more daughters, the more likely. Moreover, there is evidence that the effect is cross-cultural. For more, I'll refer you to Landsburg, by way of Cowen's posting, here: "Do girls cause divorce?"
Cowen also points out that the time available for talking in meetings is a common property resource and suggests a way to increase efficency through privatization, here: "Shutting up talkers". Cowen also links, in this post, to a short, and startling, essay by one Robin Hanson on "Fourteen Wild Ideas Five Of Which Are True!". Number two is:
In the 1970s, the RAND Health Insurance Experiment randomly assigned 5000 adults to free or full-price health care over 3-5 years. Free care folks got more eyeglasses and teeth filled, and spent ~30% more, but were otherwise no healthier. This result is consistent with typical time-series and cross-sectional analyses. I'm willing to extrapolate from this 30% change to a 50% cut. (More here.)"
The impact of globalization on world cultures
Tyler Cowen has written a book on this, called Creative Destruction: How Globalization Is Changing the World’s Cultures. There is a review by Paul Cantor, here: "Creative Destruction...". In a posting to the Volokh Conspiracy blog, Cowen says "...Paul summarizes the book better than I ever could..." From the review:
Corruption and growth in cities
Rebecca Menes looks at the relationship between U.S. urban corruption and urban growth at the start of the 20th Century in this new National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper: "Corruption in Cities: Graft and Politics in American Cities at the Turn of the Twentieth Century." (NBER Working Paper No. w9990; Issued in September 2003).
This looks interesting, here's the abstract:
Not all externalities matter
Alex Tabarrok reminds us in this post on auto safety inspections: "The Politician and the Mechanic Conspire to Rip Me Off".Revised
More tax cuts in the pipeline?
Since the big tax cut bill last spring, the House has passed additional tax cuts "...that would add more than $500 billion to deficits over the next ten years..." reports Joel Friedman at the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: "More Fiscally Irresponsible Tax Cuts This Fall? New Corporate Tax Cuts And More Budget Gimmicks Loom On The Horizon"